Key Points
While several publishers have lined up content deals with OpenAIincluding WIRED parent company Cond Nastdozens of copyright lawsuits against AI startups are winding their way through the US court system..
The complaint brought by Alternet and Raw Story focused on the DMCA, arguing that OpenAI broke the law by scraping thousands of news articles and stripping them of copyright management information (CMI) like the authors name, the terms and conditions for use of the work, and the title of the work..
The outlets asked for statutory damages of no less than $2,500 per violation, arguing OpenAI knew that stripping training data of CMI would result in copyright infringement from ChatGPT when it summarized or regurgitated articles without proper attribution...
Topic, who also represents The Intercept in a similar DMCA case against OpenAI, as well as the nonprofit newsroom the Center for Investigative Reporting in a copyright infringement case against both OpenAI and Microsoft, says he is confident that these kinds of DMCA claims are permitted under the Constitution...
Whether or not Raw Story and Alternet are ultimately allowed to file an amended complaint, this weeks dismissal appears not to foreclose other legal arguments; the judge pointedly noted that she found the specific DMCA claims lacking rather than the broader concept of infringement..
You might be interested in
Are AI chatbots in courts putting justice at risk?
05, May, 23Indian High Court judge Anoop Chitkara is among a growing number of justices using AI chatbots to assist them in rulings.
Here’s what happens when your lawyer uses ChatGPT
30, May, 23When ChatGPT goes wrong: Lawyer uses chatbot to write legal brief, ends up with fake cases and a real mess.
US lawyer used ChatGPT to prepare court filing. What happened next
10, Jun, 23The blunder occurred in a civil case being heard by Manhattan federal court involving a man who is suing the Colombian airline Avianca.
Lawyers blame ChatGPT for tricking them into citing bogus case law
09, Jun, 23Two apologetic lawyers blamed ChatGPT for tricking them into including fictitious legal research in a court filing.