Key Points
Supreme Court has asked Centre to present a road map and its future plans for restoring Jammu & Kashmir's statehood while hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the Indian government's 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution on Tuesday...
The apex court while asking the Centre to make its stand clear on the time frame and roadmap to restore the Statehood status of Jammu and Kashmir observes that "restoration of democracy is important."..
He made the remarks after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, referred to the contentious provision in the Indian Constitution, saying it gave special rights to only permanent residents of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir and was discriminatory...
The Indian Government on August 5, 2019 had revoked Article 370, which gave special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir, and bifurcated it into union territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh...
You might be interested in
WATCH: Security upped across Jammu and Kashmir ahead of SC's verdict on scrapping of Article 370
11, Dec, 23A five-judge Constitution bench headed by CJI DY Chandrachud will decide whether the decision taken by the Centre in August 2019, to abrogate the provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution, was constitutionally valid
Day-5 of hearing on Article 370: Integration of J&K with India ‘absolute and complete’, says SC
10, Aug, 23Noting that integration of Jammu and Kashmir with India was “absolute and complete”, the Supreme Court on Thursday said the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir can’t be read as a document that retained some element of sovereignty in the state.
Breaking down the Supreme Court judgement on J&K, and its wider implications
12, Dec, 23The judgment on dwelled on historical treaties, interpretation of constitutional & legal provisions, procedural proprieties, & principles of sovereignty | Latest News India
Supreme Court to give verdict on petitions contesting abolition of Article 370
11, Dec, 23The verdict will be announced by the five-judge constitution bench, which is led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and includes Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant
WATCH as CJI Chandrachud pronounces verdict on pleas challenging abrogation of Article 370 in J&K
11, Dec, 23The Supreme Court of India reserved its verdict in the matter on 5 September after a 16-day of marathon hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of the provisions of Article 370
Article 370 verdict: What does Supreme Court judgment mean for J-K?
11, Dec, 23The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the validity of the Centre's 2019 decision to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution from Jammu and Kashmir. | Latest News India
Article 370 verdict: Supreme Court upholds abrogation of special status of Jammu and Kashmir, directs EC t
11, Dec, 23Article 370 judgment: The Supreme Court's Constitution bench delivered a judgment on Monday, affirming the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution. This decision comes after the court considered a series of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the subsequent division of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories. The Constitution bench, comprised of five judges, not only upheld the constitutional changes but also issued a directive to the Election Commission. The bench mandated the Election Commission to conduct elections in Jammu and Kashmir by September 30, 2024.
Supreme Court dismisses PIL seeking to declare abrogation of Article 370 valid
21, Aug, 23Terming it as “misconceived”, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a PIL seeking to declare as constitutionally valid the abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution which accorded a special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir.
Article 370 abrogation in J-K valid: Supreme Court in landmark verdict
11, Dec, 23The Supreme Court upheld the Centre's decision to abrogate Article 370, which granted special status to Jammu and Kashmir. | Latest News India
With its Article 370 judgment, Supreme Court has driven a nail through federalism
22, Dec, 23You cannot interpret a constitution like a contract and hedge, restrict, qualify, or overlook to award the claim to a party. Clever reasoning has no place here.