India appeals WTO panel report on Tech tariffs

Posted on:
Key Points

India on Thursday appealed against a ruling by the dispute settlement body of the World Trade Organization (WTO) against New Delhis imposition of tariffs on mobile phones and electronic components, among other ICT goods..

The case, which was brought by Japan to the global trade watchdog and a WTO panel in April, said that Indias tariffs had violated global trading rules under the Information Technology Agreement (ITA)...

In its appeal, India said it has sought a review by the Appellate Body of the errors of law and legal interpretation by the Panel in its Report and requests findings by the Appellate Body...

While the April 17 order of the dispute settlement body was for three similar disputes raised by the three members who had claimed that India was applying duties on imports of certain ICT products in excess of the zero-bound duty rate set out in Indias WTO Schedule, Indias appeal is against the order on the dispute with Japan only...

Given the ongoing lack of agreement among WTO members regarding the filling of Appellate Body vacancies, there is no Appellate Body Division available at the current time to deal with the appeals, said a Geneva-based official and Indias appeal is considered an appeal into the void..

You might be interested in

EU disappointed over India's 'right' to approach WTO's appellate body in ICT duty case

19, Dec, 23

The panel in April had ruled that import duties imposed by India on certain ICT products violate global trading norms. Appellate body is the final authority to decide on trade disputes in WTO. However, it is not functioning as the US has been blocking appointments of judges in the body.

India challenges WTO panel ruling on ICT import duties at appellate body

15, Dec, 23

India appealed against WTO's ruling on import duties for information and tech products, contesting the decision following the EU-initiated dispute. The challenge highlights legal interpretations and seeks review by the non-functional appellate body due to member disputes. Despite bilateral talks, India's move signifies addressing the WTO's findings on its import duties.

Japan asks India to rescind plan to appeal ICT ruling at WTO

30, May, 23

Japan has asked India to withdraw its appeal to the World Trade Organization's (WTO) ruling against New Delhi's tariff on technology goods. The WTO had found in favour of Japan, Taiwan and the European Union in April, stating that India had breached global trading rules. At a DSB meeting on Tuesday, the US supported Japans appeal, claiming that India's tariffs negatively affect foreign businesses and limit access to technology for Indian firms and consumers. The EU and Canada urged India to resolve this dispute via the MPIA alternative.

India blames US for holding up dispute settlement at WTO, blocks China's attempt for investment pact

28, Feb, 24

India Business News: India criticizes the US for blocking WTO appellate body appointments, resulting in loss of credibility. Talks on investment facilitation and the Doha

Tariff imposition: India appeals against WTO panel report

14, Dec, 23

India on Thursday appealed against a decision by the dispute settlement body of the World Trade Organization (WTO) that had ruled against New Delhi's imposition of tariffs on mobile phones and electronic components, among other ICT goods. The case was brought by the EU and a WTO panel in April said that India had violated global trading rules.

India loses ICT levy dispute at WTO

18, Apr, 23

A World Trade Organisation dispute panel has ruled against India's import duty on mobile phones and other electronics products. The panel agreed with a complaint lodged by the European Union, Japan and Taiwan that India had breached global trade rules with the tariff. India had been challenged over a 7.5% import duty on the products, which rose to 20% despite opposition from the trade organisation's members. Delhi is expected to appeal against the ruling, although WTO dispute panel decisions can be invalid if they are not heard by an appellate body, which does not currently have any judges due to US opposition.